TOPIC:

REGEX bugs 03 Jul 2013 05:37 #7814

Tomaselli
Topic Author
Offline
Elite Member
Posts: 293
Thank you received: 87

positive integer regex rule should be:

^\d+$

instead of:

^d+$

I didn't check all, but it seems to me, many regex validation rules do not work due to the escaping of some char.

About the name of the rules, as the admin said, rules with underscore on their name are not accepted (I discovered this by myself, they simply didn't work), but then why, by default on a fresh generated component, the default rules are named with the underscore?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Last edit: by Tomaselli.

REGEX bugs 03 Jul 2013 20:10 #7822

jhallock Offline Senior Member Posts: 43 Thank you received: 1	I receive this error in a javscript alert on validation of element with the 'positive_integer' regex applied to it jqv:custom rule not found - positive integer
	Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

REGEX bugs 03 Jul 2013 20:45 #7824

Tomaselli Topic Author Offline Elite Member Posts: 293 Thank you received: 87	to fix that, you have to change the name of the rule on any file that rule is called: FROM: positive_integer TO: positiveinteger AND FROM: Positive_integer TO: Positiveinteger remember also to change the filename of the rule. then you also have to change the regex pattern from: ^d+$ to: ^\d+$ The following user(s) said Thank You: admin
	Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

REGEX bugs 03 Jul 2013 22:01 #7829

admin Offline Administrator Chef Posts: 3711 Thank you received: 986	Fixed. Do not listen Tomaselli... lol.. #Tomaselli : Thanks Coding is now a piece of cake The following user(s) said Thank You: Tomaselli, jhallock
	Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

REGEX bugs 04 Jul 2013 06:21 #7854

Tomaselli Topic Author Offline Elite Member Posts: 293 Thank you received: 87
	Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Page:
1

Forum

Debug

Closed tickets.

[FIXED] REGEX bugs

Time to create page: 0.093 seconds

“

”

I found "cook" two days ago. Played around with it for a day and then within a day got rid of two legacy applications in IBM Lotus Domino Notes and replaced them with "cook". It was really easy. A piece of cake. Actually it was even easier than cooking. Cooking involves more work than developing with "cook". What can I say about "cook"? Great application great price for what it delivers great forum with a lot of information and fast responses active and friendly community fast forward moving development cycle So what should I say "Monsieur Le Cook"? Keep the good work going it will lead to success. Having become a paying member in the words of Edith Piaf may I say ..... non rien de rien ... je ne regrette rien. Vive La France.
FK (JED)