Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
Forgot your password? Forgot your username? Create an account
Forum
Support forum
Trouble shooting
Difference in Appearance XRef Fields
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC:

Difference in Appearance XRef Fields 30 Sep 2015 15:29 #13541

  • MorganL
  • MorganL's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 438
  • Thank you received: 53
I am running Joomla 3.4.1, no special admin template, no view overrides, no style overrides, but my multi-select looks like a MULTI SELECT dropdowb box as opposed to your fancy item picker

Here are your vs mine screenshots

Yours



Mine

Morgan Leecy MCSE

Novell / Linux
PHP. MYSQL, Apache, node.js
Coldfusion, JQuery, HTML5
Joomla

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Difference in Appearance XRef Fields 30 Sep 2015 16:38 #13542

  • admin
  • admin's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Chef
  • Posts: 3711
  • Thank you received: 986
You are missing the chosen library.
It is strange because as far as I know it is shipped with Joomla. Isn't it ?

It works the same, but the rendering is different. It is not Cook problem.
The only diffirence comes with the list groups wich are handled differently with chosen. (Causing problem with second level of group)
But that's not the point.
Coding is now a piece of cake
The following user(s) said Thank You: MorganL

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Difference in Appearance XRef Fields 30 Sep 2015 17:50 #13545

  • MorganL
  • MorganL's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • Posts: 438
  • Thank you received: 53
I just installed in another Joomla install 3.4.3.. and the fields render perfectly.. wierd!

OK, local issue, sorry!
Morgan Leecy MCSE

Novell / Linux
PHP. MYSQL, Apache, node.js
Coldfusion, JQuery, HTML5
Joomla

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
  • Page:
  • 1
Forum
Support forum
Trouble shooting
Difference in Appearance XRef Fields
Time to create page: 0.077 seconds
“
”
Great UX great performance and definitely a time saver. It only took me 10 minutes of playing around before purchasing a subscription and right now I just want to throw more money at you! I just started a new project and after just 4h I can already tell it probably saved me several days of work. I'm building a wholesale ordering system with sales rep management. I have not looked at the code yet but so far: impressive.
flip (Forum)

Get Started

Log In Sign In